ive read some articles and the writers said its like an un-traditional ferrari and thats its "ugly" and unfast. they are super wrong. Some of us would be very thankful for even like a new car in this economy. They dont have to be snobby.|||The back is ugly, and it is the slowest new Ferrari.
Plus it is named California.
Ferrari's are named after Italian Cities and people, not American States.|||i'm a long time Ferrari fan and always will be. I think the California will be a fantastic car, Ferraris usually are. i like that it's as versatile as it is, whether it's able to be used as a daily driver or not, a Ferrari is a Ferrari and they're all special. i tend to like better the ones that are more specialized and thus make them more of an event to drive. driving even a special car on every day duties makes it seem more like a normal car. as far as looks go, it's not drop dead gorgeous like the original Californias, but in my opinion, Ferrari hasn't made a truly pretty car since the F355. lately, Ferrari's seem to have adopted the same company "face" across the model range much like other car companies do. despite initial observations, every time a new Ferrari comes out, even if the testers all say it isn't the best looking Ferrari of all time, it always ends up being phenominal at whatever it was designed to do, whether it be race around a track, or eat up long distances in style.|||Because it is a hard top. I like the 360 Modena, F430 and the 599 GTB Fiorano. LAMBORGHINI ALL THE WAY.|||all cars are special in their own way.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment